Hi Zaba,
Thanks for the suggestion! I can certainly see the merit in that idea.
For text fields, we already have several customization options in the field editor, such as field prefixes, descriptions, and addons for before and after the field.
The challenge here is balancing flexibility with complexity, so we can do what we want to do but don't end up with an interface that's overly complicated and slows us down.
I think our next revision with the field editors is to create a more visual tool. This would provide a preview of what the field will actually look like and allow you to click on parts to add text and see the result.
I'll make a note of your suggestion and give it some thought, thanks! Feel free to share if anything else comes to mind.
Dave Edis - Senior Developer
interactivetools.com