 |
DefenceTalk.com
User
Oct 24, 2006, 9:29 PM
Post #1 of 4
(350 views)
Shortcut
|
|
AM2's Search Engine...
|
Can't Post
|
|
Is there anyway to tell AM2 or its search engine where the article begins and where it ends and it should only search for keywords in article content/body area?
We've got non-AM2 content displaying on where the published articles are and whenever you search for certain keyword, AM2 displays all articles because it is searching ALL of the article page rather than the body...
Example:
http://www.defencetalk.com/cgi-bin/news/search.cgi
Search for JF-17 keyword. There are about 40-50 articles that mention JF-17 yet it displays result for almost every article. 
Solution?
(This post was edited by DefenceTalk.com on Oct 24, 2006, 9:30 PM)
|
|
| |
|
Dave
Staff
/ Moderator
Oct 24, 2006, 11:08 PM
Post #2 of 4
(346 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [DefenceTalk.com] AM2's Search Engine...
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Well, the first page looks right.
I think what's going on is the keyword isn't being passed forward in the "next >>" link.
Try editing your "templates/searchEngine/searchResults.html" template. Near the bottom there will some templateIf tags and long links that start with "$settings.searchurl$?". Right after the ? in the link add the following:
keyword=$form.keyword:urlEncoded$&
So it should look something like this:
<a href="$settings.searchurl$?keyword=$form.keyword:urlEncoded$&action=...
Then try your search again and see if the right results are coming up on the second page this time.
Dave Edis - Senior Developer
interactivetools.com
|
|
| |
|
MEKAEEL
User
Oct 25, 2006, 9:37 AM
Post #3 of 4
(330 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [Dave] AM2's Search Engine...
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
it worked! I had the same problem and now it's all working.
but I had to add the same for the "<< previous" link since it had the same problem going.
cheers!
|
|
| |
|
DefenceTalk.com
User
Oct 25, 2006, 9:56 AM
Post #4 of 4
(326 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [MEKAEEL] AM2's Search Engine...
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Thank you Dave, that worked very nicely!
|
|
| |
|
